
Over the past four years, I have carried out an ongoing conversation with Herman Bigham, an African American collector, preserver and presenter of African art, who fights for the rights of Africans to have a significant voice in how African culture is preserved, presented and used in various discourses in the United States of America. Bigham (pictured above with Prof. Cornell West [right] and Tavis Smiley) is a culture warrior and a significant voice in the emerging struggle over the rights to African cultural patrimony. Like all visionary figures, Bigham invites divergent responses: for those who understand the scope and enormity of Bigham’s struggle (and especially for his primarily African American constituency), he is a hero. However, for many in the academic context of my professional practice as an Africanist art historian, he is a dangerous dilettante. Suffice to say there is method in his modes of conduct and after interacting with him for the past four years, I can say definitely that his work is important and topical.
The African American experience has often been narrated in political terms, with focus on the ongoing struggle to achieve coeval citizenship for African Americans in the American story. There is however one aspect of this struggle that is equally important—the relationship between African Americans and Africa, their ancestral homeland which plays out in complex acts of identification, negotiation, engagement and even rejection. Africa is an imaginary in the African American mind: it is the promise of wholeness and at once a land of myth. Here in the USA, the demonization of Africa in the public imagination compels complex emotional reactions among African Americans played out in forms of social engagements with the cultural heritage of the continent. Africanisms abound, as does signage of all kinds—kente fabrics used as markers of African identity, corn-rows as fashionable hairstyles, and other such modes of African-inspired worldmaking. I recently watched a video of Los Angeles inner city youth pioneering a dance form they called Krump and was both elated and very sad: it seemed to me an untutored form of spirit possession, such as one might encounter in the higher echelons of Vodun or masquerading rituals. Here then are African children in the Diaspora trying to dance their way through to spiritual transcendence. I was glad to see them digging back to this complex root of African identity but also worried about the dangers inherent in a search for spirit possession pursued without the benefit of trained diviners. But hey, they call it dance and Krump, like most African American cultural inventions, is now making its way into music videos and Nike Ads (of course!), where it enriches corporations who exploit these inventions without regard for the original inventors.
It is necessary to see Bigham’s work in terms of this struggle to secure for Africans a share of the discursive and economic benefits of their own cultural heritage. Many African Americans who can afford it collect forms of African art as a form of identification with the continent but you won’t know it from reviews art exhibitions documented in principal books and journals of African art history over the past fifty years. I have actually researched this subject and can attest that the primary journal in the field of African art history has not documented a single exhibition of African art from the collection of an African American collector of African art in over forty years of its publication. This raises the question: do African Americans, and Africans for that matter, collect African art? If so, why are their art collections not visible in the discourse? Is this omission deliberate or accidental? Above all, what does this fact tell us about the discourse itself and its assumptions of objectivity in scholarship? The usual ploy is to describe the artworks in such collections as valueless agglomerations of replicas and forgeries but surely, not all African American or African collections of African art can be so defined. Herman Bigham has a significant collection of African art built up over the past decades. I have personally seen this collection and it is as credible as those of several other collections I’ve seen exhibited in various museums in Europe and the USA over the past two decades. Bigham is also an art dealer and advises a large number of collectors in the Boston-Atlanta Metropolitan Axis or BAMA (apologies William Gibson). He attends art fairs in Europe and the USA and interacts with many of the same dealers who supply notable museums in both contexts. Bigham mainly pursues the stated objective of using his art collection as a tool to educate African Americans about their cultural heritage and in this his collection is used pretty much in the same manner as those of many museums. Unlike them however, he has produced and executed many exhibitions of his artworks in public libraries, airports and other high-profile areas where the works are encountered by large numbers of people (apparently, many museums he contacted have refused to feature his sculptures in their spaces thus consolidating a process of exclusion that essentially contributes to the marginalization pointed out above). Basically, Bigham asks pointed questions about how African art is presented in the USA, especially with regard to the unstated fact that many American museum exhibitions of African art mainly recycle the collections of a handful of white collectors and use these to define structures of financial and discursive value that completely marginalizes African American and African collectors. Bigham sees this tendency as part of the armature of racial segregation since it essentially excludes African American voices from discussions about African cultural heritage and cultural objects, in a context where these objects continue to have major cultural significance for African Americans in general.
There is an issue here—the question of cultural equity, which basically involves investigating how and why African American and African cultural capital continues to be transferred whole cloth to white ownership, with the attendant problems of authenticating and validating African art implied in such ownership. I met Bigham because I was working on this problem from a similar angle, asking questions about why African and African Diaspora cultural knowledge is undervalued in the global economy. It seemed to me that he has not been given a proper hearing. Herman Bigham is a cultural activist and over the years he has sustained an important cultural and educational project in Philadelphia focused on presentation of African art. This work is now receiving important national attention. The depth and consistency of Bigham’s work over the past decade is impressive and requires nuanced engagement and respect. Over the past decade, Herman Bigham and Associates (HBA), a grassroots, self-motivated, passionate collective of African Cultural Arts preservers and presenters, has initiated independently produced exhibitions, educational events and materials that provide new audiences with a richer vision and knowledge of African cultures. HBA has produced and marketed twenty presentations that have appeared in eight national publications and on numerous television shows in seven years. More than a million viewers in nine cities nationally have enthusiastically welcomed its exhibitions of African sculpture at museum and public venues. Bigham’s current project involves artworks lent to the America I AM: The African American Imprint exhibition currently showing at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia.
The exhibition, which celebrates 500 years of African American contributions to the USA, opened on January 15 and will run through May 3 before traveling on a tour that could include up to ten museums over a five-year period. According to a press release, the exhibition was developed in partnership with prominent late-night talk host Travis Smiley, and organized by Cincinnati Museum Center and Arts and Exhibitions International, which also organized the King Tut exhibition that last year became the most attended touring exhibition in the world. The 15,000 square foot exhibition, with over 200 items presents a historical continuum of pivotal moments in courage, conviction, and creativity that solidifies the undeniable imprint of African Americans across the nation and around the world. America I AM provides context for how African Americans contributed to and shaped American culture across four core areas: economic, socio-political, cultural, and spiritual, up to present-day events, including the inauguration of the first African American president.
I am intrigued by the fact that this exhibition is in part a Tavis Smiley Project. The renowned PBS journalist is one of a number of African Americans who are coming to the center of the national dialogue after years spent building up independent practices initially directed at black audiences. Tyler Perry's success in Hollywood is another important example and I think Herman Bigham is engaged in similar focus with his work in Philadelphia. Pay attention to this cultural activist: he is clearly on to something.Images above courtesy of Herman Bigham & Associates African Art Preservers and Presenters.









